Guess The Picture: A Foul Orifice
Guess what is in this picture:

It's a foul orifice, that you wouldn't want to be anywhere near. Still unsure?
Have a look at the whole, uncensored, picture.
View list of all tags
Guess what is in this picture:

It's a foul orifice, that you wouldn't want to be anywhere near. Still unsure?
Have a look at the whole, uncensored, picture.
Okay, so everybody's going nuts over this Vanity Fair cover:
..and why not. It's got Scarlett Johansson naked, it's got Keira Knightley naked, it's got Tom Ford.
Tom Fucking Ford?! What the ...
But really, I'm actually quite distressed by this picture. Even the most amateur photographer knows that by flat-lighting a subject, you lose almost all of its detail. Curves, bends, and texture all disappear... and how is Scarlett lit? Flat as buggery, that's how. For the first time in her life, someone has managed to make her look kinda plumpish!
This is a woman who probably weighs less that a Grande Latte from Starbucks, in her first ever naked photo shoot, and some limp cocked moron has destroyed the whole bloody thing by forgetting the first thing he learnt at celebrity-nude-photo-school.
At least the New York Post published a version where the edge of her nipple hasn't been airbrushed out.
ehehe Scarlett Johansson's nipple. Ehheeh.
So I bet you've all been wondering what Scarlett Johansson has been up to lately? If you're like me, you've been checking Junkheap for updates daily and coming away dissapointed, and yet strangely aroused. Well, wait no more!
I saw this in my RSS reader and thought it was my lucky day, what with the Anne Hathaway tittie pics too.

(in case you're interested, the headline was the much more boring Jennifer Connelly Does Something, Delights Us.)
Well it took longer than we all expected, but that dodgy chick from that dodgy film got her dodginess on.
Read on for ridiculously large jpegs.